The ECDPM Weekly Compass is your reliable source on the latest ACP & EU policy developments and analysis, in your mailbox Friday afternoons

Editor's Pick

Is there a new impetus on the EU to deal with conflict and fragility in third countries? 
In the first of two articles on ECDPM Talking Points Blog, Andrew Sherriff looks at recent institutional developments in the EU and outlines the recommendations of one of the most comprehensive evaluations in the field of conflict prevention and peace building. Although dealing with conflict and fragility remains a shared responsibility across the different EU institutions, new specialised units to deal with the topic have been created in the EEAS and the European Commission’s DG DEVCO. In line with the evaluation, Sherriff notes that despite positive developments, much needs to be done in order to strengthen the EU's ability to achieve outcomes in this area. A follow-up article will be posted on ECDPM Talking Points blog next week which will look at recent policy developments in conflict and fragility.

Policy News 

Europe finalised position for Busan 
EU Development Ministers met in Brussels on 14 November to adopt a common position for the high-level forum on aid effectiveness taking place in Busan from 29 November to 1 December. There is a strong accent on a more inclusive understanding of domestic ownership and on accountability, as fundamental prerequisites for aid to achieve sustainable development results. A new approach to situations in conflict and fragility is also elaborated. Interestingly, the position does not refer explicitly to policy coherence for development. But, there is a demanding call on partner countries and both traditional and new donors to live up to their commitments and to be more transparent. In a 'Transparency Guarantee', the EU commits to provide more detailed and forward-looking information on aid volumes and allocations. This is important as statistics from OECD DAC only provide information on past flows. The EU’s common position for Busan also increases the use of joint planning at country level. A lot of questions remain on how all this will translate in practice and in specific contexts and situations. Although the EU is indeed scoring pretty well in many aspects of aid effectiveness principles and aid transparency, the gap between its policy discourse and practice is still wide. 

EU shows its interests in Africa more openly
The EU Foreign Affairs Council signed off on a new “EU Strategic Framework for the Horn of Africa” earlier this week. This document clearly illustrates that the EU, with its institutions and member-states, wants also to pursue its interests beyond poverty alleviation to protecting its own citizens from threats that emanate from the region. The EU commits to appoint a new European Union Special Representative for the region with the goal to enhance the coherence, quality, impact and visibility of the EU’s multifaceted action in the in the Horn of Africa. This strategic framework represents yet another indicator of a trend where the EU is being more open about pursuing multiple interests in addition to poverty alleviation in Africa.

Member States in EU divided on EDF budgetisation
An interim report from EU Council Ambassadors on the development finance aspects on the EU’s Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) for the 2014-2020 period says that some countries could accept that the European Development Fund (EDF) would remain outside the MFF. While a number supported the Commission proposal to keep, for the time being, the EDF outside the MFF, some called for its budgetisation. In this context, the question of the contribution key for the EDF was raised, with some States insisting on the fact that it should be identical to the usual budgetary contribution key, while others pleaded for the status quo, which reflects historical links of some Member States to the beneficiary countries. A number of countries supported the priority to respect the EU's formal undertaking to commit 0.7% of gross national product to Official Development Assistance (ODA) by 2015. Some however expressed doubts on the fact that as much as 15% of the collective EU ODA effort should come from the EU budget and the EDF. A comprehensive report on the MFF debate will be presented to the EU General Affairs Council on 5 December. The MFF negotiation phase is due to start in January 2012. The proposal for the 11th European Development Fund that is supposed to enter into force at the same time as the new MFF is also under preparation. 

South Africa receives additional EU support
A draft EU regulation approved by the EU Parliament and Council Conciliation Committee on 31 October proposes to include Asia, Central Asia, Latin America, Iraq, Iran, Yemen, and South Africa in the current EU financing instrument for cooperation with industrialised and other high income countries in order to promote diversified links with those States. These countries will continue to also remain under the scope of the EU’s Development Cooperation financing instrument, but inclusion under the additional regulation will allow the financing of measures which, in principle, do not qualify as Official Development Assistance (ODA) under the existing criteria, but which are crucially important. The European Commission is expected to present its proposals for new legal bases for financing EU external action on 7 December. 

EU: unclear instruments with clear results?
The current European multi-annual budget includes 10 external action budget lines, or so-called ‘legal instruments’. ECDPM carried out a study for the EC, looking into what lessons could be learnt from the past experience of EU external action programmes under 6 of these 10 instruments. The evaluation analysed at two separate bodies of evidence: preparatory documents and EU Regulations that explain what the 6 legal instruments set out to achieve, as well as 57 EC evaluation reports describing whether these expected results were actually achieved. The study finds that the 6 instruments are in themselves not always clear and that they were not designed in a manner that facilitates their evaluation. Key conclusions from the study could inform the design and ‘evaluability’ of the legal instruments under the EU’s next multi-annual budget. Such efforts are needed both for accountability and for policy learning, especially beyond the level of outputs and outcomes in order to verify whether results achieved promote the required global impact, which ultimately justifies the financial investments made. 

New Organisational Charts Available for EEAS and European Commission’s DEVCO
The European External Action Service has made available a new version of its “Graphic Representation” on its website dated 1st of October 2011. With the same date the European Commission’s DEVCO also has a new version of its organigramme which still notes that two high level positions of Deputy Director General have yet to be filled.

More private sector for development - but whose private sector? 
“Policies for Promoting The Private Sector’s Role in Development” was the subject for debate at a recent high-level roundtable event organised by Friends of Europe on 8 November. ECDPM's Bruce Byiers, who attended, reflects on the discussions from the event in an article on the Talking Point blog and stresses the need for more clarity – and perhaps different terminology – when speaking about "the private sector". As this is inevitably a very broad theme, policies for promoting "private sector" involvement need to distinguish between international private finance for development ends, and strengthening domestic private sectors in developing countries. This distinction can take the debate on bringing the private sector in forward in more concrete terms, Byiers points out. 

Neo-patrimonialism can be beneficial 
Donors see neo-patrimonialism - a term used for patrons using state resources in order to secure the loyalty of clients in the general population - as irredeemably bad for economic development, but evidence shows that the opposite can be true. Two new publications, “Rethinking the Relationship between Neo-patrimonialism and Economic Development in Africa” by Tim Kelsall and “Neopatrimonialism in Africa and Beyond” by Daniel Bach and Mamoudou Gazibo look deeper into this issue, calling for a reappraisal of the concept of neo-patrimonialism. Case studies from Africa present country-specific evidence. To weave a comparative analysis of the interplay between public policies and private interest, Bach and Gazibo’s book also discusses neo-patrimonialism across other word regions, Including Europe. 

Additional articles in the Weekly Compass-Extended Version include: More recently uploaded resources can be found on the Weekly Compass-Extended Version.



No. 82, 18 November 2011

Dear *|FNAME|*,
     In addition to the Busan and Horn of Africa EU Council conclusions highlighted in this issue of the Weekly Compass, EU Foreign Affairs and Development Ministers also adopted the EU’s position on the 10th European Development Fund performance review and conclusions on the EU's annual report on development and external assistance policies. Ministers also held their first discussions on EC proposals to refocus EU development aid, the so-called "agenda for change", and on the future approach to EU budget support to third countries. Member States will discuss and decide their positions ahead of Council conclusions that will fully set out the refocusing of EU development policy and establish the new approach to EU budget support expected to be adopted at the spring 2011 EU Foreign Affairs Council meeting. 
     Also this week, the EU became the latest donor to publish their foreign aid data to the International Aid Transparency Initiative (IATI). 
     The European Commission published is 2012 workplan this week which includes a section on “giving the EU an effective voice in the wider world”.
     Also this week, the EU Council’s ACP Working Party launched discussions on the Informal Interinstitutional Working Group on ACP-EU relations after 2020
     As we go to press, the EC has just published a Communication on the future development of a comprehensive European approach to migration issues when dealing with third countries. Several meetings dealing with migration issues were held this week and will be held next week. 
     The ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly starts its bi-annual meeting tomorrow in Lome. The meeting runs to 23 November as is expected to discuss the famine situation in the Horn of Africa and the impact of the Arab Spring in the Sahel-Saharan region amongst other issues.
     Some useful comments have been posted on our Talking Points blog article on “Questioning old certainties – What is in store for EU-Africa relations in 2012?”We invite readers to share their own observations as we work on our Challenges InBrief 2012 to be published at the end of this year.
     For more on this and all the latest EU, African, Caribbean and Pacific governance, trade and development news, see the Weekly Compass-Extended Version.

All the best,

Melissa Julian 

Off the track

NGOs criticise World Bank's new lending plan for poorer countries
John Vidal writes in the Guardian that NGOs say Programme-for-Results Lending would allow countries to sidestep tough social and environmental safeguards that recipients of World Bank loans must normally meet. 


ECDPM Talking points

 Weekly Compass news archive
A rapidly growing, searchable online database, currently numbering about 20000 news resources

Event calendar
Follow the major ECDPM and ACP-EU events on our calendar
ECDPM Events
ECDPM websites
Discover our thematic websites:
Sharing information with stakeholders
Information centre
Visit the InfoCentre

Copyright © 2011 *|LIST:COMPANY|*, All rights reserved.

Publisher: The Weekly Compass is produced by ECDPM with financial resources provided by our core funder, the government of the Netherlands, and other financial partners - Ireland, Sweden, Finland, Belgium, Luxemburg, Portugal, Switzerland and the UK.

If you received this e-newsletter from a colleague and would like to subscribe, you can do it on the ECDPM website. We encourage our readers to circulate this newsletter to interested colleagues.

Editor: Melissa Julian, Knowledge Managment Officer, e-mail:
Assistant Editor: Sonia Niznik, Information Assistant . e-mail:

Call or SMS on mobile +32 (0)47 328 11 65 - Fax +32 (0)2 237 43 19

Visit Melissa's Profile

Visit Sonia's Profile

Disclaimer: This newsletter has been created with great care though it may contain links to websites which are created and maintained by other organisations and which have information that is not complete or accurate. The contents of this message may express personal views which are not the views of ECDPM unless specifically stated. Reproduction is authorised provided that the source is acknowledged. However, we are not liable for the subsequent use of the information. The information contained in this e-mail is intended for the person to whom it is addressed and may include confidential and/or privileged information. If you have received this e-mail in error please contact the sender immediately via