How Evolution Hurts Science
As a leading research professor, John Sanford has seen the harmful effects of how a faulty worldview inhibits good science, especially in the area of alleged “junk DNA”. In this fascinating DVD, he shows how these fallacious arguments are used to discriminate against anyone who dares to take a stand against the prevailing worldview of evolution and millions-of–years. He also describes how to prevail over those who would like to silence people with a biblical worldview.
As the Lord puts it on your heart to help us continue to produce free resources like this, won't you please make a tax-deductible donation of any amount? Call us during regular office hours at 1-800-422-4253 or make a donation online
Jurassic Park author rips
"settled science" to shreds!
While preparing a new Creation Moments program that will air a few months from now, we came across an outstanding lecture that the late Michael Crichton gave at CalTech in 2003. So keep the following quote in mind the next time an evolutionist or global-warming alarmist tells you that the consensus of scientific opinion is on their side!
"I regard consensus science as an extremely pernicious development that ought to be stopped cold in its tracks. Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled. Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on something or other, reach for your wallet, because you're being had.
"Let's be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus.
"There is no such thing as consensus science. If it's consensus, it isn't science. If it's science, it isn't consensus. Period."