|Of course, this is about much more than undoing baseless insults.
What the Case Comes Down To
Itâ€™s an opportunity for a leader in the 9/11 Truth Movement to show in a court of law that the science behind controlled demolition is not just legitimate, but overwhelming.
Moreover, because Dr. Harrit has been a national figure ever since his 2009 appearance on TV2NEWS
, the case is likely to be widely covered in the Danish media â€” especially if he wins!
Under Danish libel law, Villemoes has the burden of demonstrating a factual basis for his claim. As a journalist, he must also demonstrate that his reporting meets the standards of good journalism. At the first trial, he did neither
. Still, the judge egregiously ruled in his favor.
In the High Court, Villemoes will have a much harder time, because Dr. Harrit is being allowed to submit more evidence â€” namely, the video of WTC 7â€™s destruction, as well as an actual sample of the WTC dust, which Dr. Harrit will use to demonstrate the dustâ€™s authenticity, and therefore his good scientific conduct.
Dr. Harrit will also call two witnesses. One, Jan Utzon, is a world-renowned architect and AE911Truth petition signer who testified previously. The other, Dr. Per HedegÃ¥rd, is a physics professor from the University of Copenhaganâ€™s Niels Bohr Institute. His statement to a newspaper in 2010 dismissing Dr. Harrit was the only evidence used by Villemoes at trial. Today, Dr. HedegÃ¥rd has completely reversed his position and insists on testifying in support of Dr. Harrit!
Thanks to Dr. Harritâ€™s relentless pursuit of the truth, we now have an incredible opportunity to achieve some symbolic justice for all
9/11 researchers and activists.
You can learn more about the case by reading our recently published article
We thank you for helping us support Niels Harrit