|In this edition
The U.S. Supreme Court upholds health care reform: Now what?
The Supreme Court today upheld key provisions of the Affordable Care Act, President Obama's signature legislation designed to increase access to health care and rein in costs.
"This is the most dramatic legislation to influence health care in America since the creation of Medicare and Medicaid in the 1960s," said Vivian Ho, James A. Baker III Institute Chair in Health Economics. "The court's decision today means well over 30 million people who are uninsured today will get access to affordable health insurance and therefore health care."
The high court upheld the ACA's controversial individual mandate, which requires most Americans to get insurance or pay a penalty (which the Supreme Court considers a tax), and partially upheld an expansion in Medicaid coverage.
Texas, which joined a lawsuit challenging health care reform as unconstitutional, is now under pressure to comply with the law, said Elena Marks, Baker Institute Scholar in Health Policy. "The state has not yet developed health insurance exchanges, which will be a government-administered marketplace where small businesses and families can buy insurance," she said.
Ho agreed. With more than 6 million people uninsured in Texas — the most in the nation — "we've now got a gargantuan task ahead of us," she said. If Texas is unable to meet ACA deadlines, the federal government will step in to assist — not an ideal situation if the federal design isn't the right fit for Texas, she notes.
Under today's ruling, states now have a choice to opt in or out of expanded Medicaid coverage. Currently, Medicaid primarily covers children, pregnant women and the disabled. The ACA extends coverage to everyone with incomes under 133 percent of the federal poverty level — $30,000 a year for a family of four.
The federal government will pay for 100 percent of the expansion until 2016, and 90 percent thereafter. The potential to obtain billions in federal funds "is a great opportunity" for Texas, said Marks — especially since research shows that every federal health care dollar spent in Texas generates 3.25 times that amount in economic activity.
While the ACA is "the best possible solution in light of an extreme problem we're facing," Ho said, she would like to see payment reforms that improve value by driving down health care costs and improving quality. To that end, the Baker Institute Health Policy Program on July 13 will host a conference on comparative effective research (CER), which examines how different treatments, tests or procedures for specific conditions have worked for others, and at what cost. The aim of CER is to identify high quality treatments at a reasonable price.
Today's ruling marks the start of an era in which the promise of affordable health care for all is within reach, Ho said. "This is a huge shift in both how the private and public markets are going to work. There are a lot of details to work out, but a decade from now, I expect to see more Americans with access to higher quality, affordable health care."
[back to top]
For a complete list of upcoming events, visit our events page.
Research and News
For a complete list, visit our publications page.
[back to top]
Baker Institute Blog
For a complete list, visit the Baker Institute Blog.
A new anti-drug strategy in Mexico? by Nathan P. Jones, Alfred C. Glassell III Postdoctoral Fellow in Drug Policy. June 26
Supreme Court's Arizona immigration ruling: A balanced approach by Tony Payan, Baker Institute Scholar for Immigration Studies. June 25
Mexican government gets wrong man in high profile drug arrest … again by Nathan P. Jones, Alfred C. Glassell III Postdoctoral Fellow in Drug Policy. June 25
U.S. congressman piques Mexico's presidential frontrunner by Nathan P. Jones, Alfred C. Glassell III Postdoctoral Fellow in Drug Policy. June 22
James A. Baker, III: Economy, not Iran or China, biggest threat to America. The Honorable James A. Baker, III, and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton discuss foreign policy with journalist Charlie Rose. June 21
After the Arab Spring: A crisis of leadership by Marc Sabbagh, 2012 graduate of Rice University and Master of Arts candidate at Johns Hopkins University's Paul Nitze School of Advanced International Studies. June 20
Why NY's move to decriminalize marijuana is rational by William Martin, who leads the Baker Institute Drug Policy Program and is the Harry and Hazel Chavanne Senior Fellow for Religion and Public Policy. June 12
A new generation of space entrepreneurs by George Abbey, Baker Botts Senior Fellow in Space Policy. June 7
Can Cruz best Dewhurst in the Senate runoff race? by Robert Stein, fellow in urban politics. June 5
Dewhurst vs. Cruz, three Hispanic setbacks and two surprises by Mark Jones, fellow in political science, Joseph D. Jamail Chair in Latin American Studies and chair of the Department of Political Science at Rice University. May 31
For a complete list, visit our webcast page.
Get involved with the Baker Institute
Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Watch us on YouTube
Join the discussion on our blog
The James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy is a nonpartisan public policy think tank located on the campus of Rice University in Houston, Texas. The institute's distinguished fellows and scholars research and collaborate with experts from academia, government, the media, business and private organizations on domestic and foreign policy issues with the goal of bridging the gap between the theory and practice of public policy.