To: <<Salutation>> <<First Name>> <<Last Name>>
<<Position>> <<Organization>>
UMassGod and guns
Legal theories in 1st and 2nd Amendment cases weave complex and contradictory web
catalog
Links


Dear <<Salutation>> <<Last Name>>:

A pending Supreme Court case involving gun rights raises curious parallels – and incongruities – with recent religious liberty cases that touch on the same constitutional issues regarding state’s rights, individual rights and the powers of the federal government.

gunThe Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments in the case of McDonald v. Chicago, which concerns an individual’s right to bear arms vs. the right of states and municipalities to restrict possession of certain weapons. The outcome of the case could have far-reaching consequences, if, among other reasons, the Court decides to “incorporate” the Second Amendment as an individual right to bear arms. “Incorporation,” in this case, would apply the Second Amendment against the states, barring them from infringing on the right to bear arms and making federal courts the guardians of gun-liberty.

The issue of incorporation was recently raised in the context of the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause – “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.” In Elk Grove Unified School District v. Newdow, Justice Clarence Thomas opined that the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause should not be incorporated; which, in contrast to the conservative justices’ views on gun rights, means that individual states would be free to legislate on certain matters respecting religion, such as the placement of religious symbols in public places, prayers at high school graduations, and the content of school curriculum.

thomas “The text and history of the Establishment Clause strongly suggest that it is a federalism provision intended to prevent Congress from interfering with state establishments. Thus, unlike the Free Exercise Clause, which does protect an individual right, it makes little sense to incorporate the Establishment Clause,” Thomas wrote in Newdow.

Read the rest of this article on Web Sage.

Thomas’s judicial philosophy and the issue of judicial activism vs. restraint are further discussed in the Massachusetts Press book, Religious Liberty in America: The First Amendment in Historical and Contemporary Perspective by Bruce T. Murray.

<<Library>> Read about the author here.

Thinker Web Sage Content Development
Web Sage specializes in educational publishing and Web development. Let Web Sage help your businesses, nonprofit organization, or university institution. www.websage.us

Take me off this list

Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp