|
12 June 2025
Would you like to receive this and/or other newsletters directly from ECRE?
Subscribe
Does your organisation have any recent reports, upcoming events or open job vacancies that you would like to see included in the Weekly Bulletin? Send them to Ben Moore.
|
|
EUROPEAN DEVELOPMENTS
RECENT REPORTS
|
|
EUROPEAN DEVELOPMENTS
CENTRAL EUROPE
- A German court has ruled that the new government’s policy of turning away undocumented people at the border is unlawful.
- The vote on a controversial legislative proposal aimed at severely curtailing the activities of NGOs in Hungary has been postponed.
- A new United Nations report has revealed that Ukrainian refugees have made a significant contribution to Poland’s economy.
A German court has ruled that the new government’s policy of turning away undocumented people at the border is unlawful. On 2 June, the Berlin Administrative Court ruled that a decision to prevent three Somali nationals who tried to enter to Germany from Poland from applying for asylum on 9 May was not in line with the EU’s Dublin system. “Persons who express the wish to seek asylum while at a border check on German territory may not be turned back,” the court said in a statement on its decision. Despite the court ruling, Minister of the Interior Alexander Dobrindt appeared to be determined to continue with his policy. “We are sticking to the pushbacks. We see that the legal basis is there and will therefore continue to proceed in this way, regardless of this individual case decision,” he said. The court ruling was welcomed by ECRE member organisation PRO ASYL which had provided support in all three cases. “The rulings are groundbreaking,” said PRO ASYL Director Karl Kopp, adding: “It’s a clear signal to interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt: His approach is illegal, his approach violates European law, his argument about Article 72 does not apply”. Kopp’s words were echoed by opposition MP Irene Mihalic (Alliance 90/The Greens): “This is a severe defeat for the federal government and should serve as a warning to abide by the law in the future and not knowingly exceed its own powers for populist purposes,” she told the Rheinische Post newspaper.
A few days after the Berlin court ruling, senior members of both the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and Christian Social Union CSU) accused PRO ASYL of having staged the incident at the Germany-Poland border. “PRO ASYL has been operating along the refugee routes for years, including at the border crossings (…) For me, this clearly bears the hallmarks of a setup by asylum activists,” said the head of the CDU parliamentary group in the Bundestag (lower house of parliament) Alexander Hoffmann MP. His words were echoed by the CDU/CSU’s domestic policy spokesman, Alexander Throm: “It’s one thing to advocate for refugees at home. But it takes on a completely different quality when people are deliberately supported in crossing the border illegally. PRO ASYL has thus crossed a line itself,” he told the Bild newspaper. PRO ASYL denied the politicians’ accusations: “We are a human rights organisation and support refugees in court,” Karl Kopp told the Augsburger Allgemeine newspaper, adding: “This is an attack on our work”. In a statement published on the organisation’s website on the same day, Kopp wrote: “Instead of putting an end to the obvious violations of the law, judges are being threatened and human rights work is being defamed and slandered. PRO ASYL will not bow to this pressure. Our mission remains to stand resolutely by the side of those affected, both legally and humanitarian, defending their rights and fighting against all forms of injustice”. “PRO ASYL demands an end to the unlawful rejections of asylum seekers at Germany’s internal borders. We demand a return to law and order – and to a civil, fact-based discourse,” he concluded.
The vote on a controversial legislative proposal aimed at severely curtailing the activities of NGOs in Hungary has been postponed. The ‘Transparency in Public Life’ proposal was due to be debated and voted in mid-June but on 4 June, the leader of the governing Fidesz party’s parliamentary group in the Hungarian parliament, Máté Kocsis told the Index news agency: “We are removing the transparency law from the legislative committee’s agenda for this Thursday, and Parliament will not be making a decision on the matter until after summer”. “The [Fidesz] parliamentary group is united in the view that legal instruments must be used to protect sovereignty. However, there is debate over what those instruments should be,” he added. Commenting on the government’s announcement, ECRE member organisation the Hungarian Helsinki Committee wrote on Bluesky on 5 June: “Postponing the final vote on the bill is not a retreat but merely a tactical delay. Protests by civic actors, media and businesses helped secure this temporary relief. The next months will be crucial to safeguard freedom of expression, association and assembly”.
The Hungarian government’s decision to postpone the debate and vote on the draft law may have been influenced by external pressure from the EU and the Council of Europe. On 23 May – 10 days after the proposal was initially submitted – a spokesperson for the European Commission told journalists that it had “great concerns” about the draft law and that “if adopted as it is, it would constitute a serious breach of EU principles and law”. “Therefore, we ask that this draft be withdrawn from the legislative process. We will not hesitate to take the necessary action if this draft is adopted,” they added. Four days later, the Council of Europe Commissioner Human Rights Michael O’Flaherty urged Hungarian MEPs not to adopt the draft law in its current format. “I respectfully ask members of the National Assembly to refrain from adopting the draft law unless it is amended to comply with international human rights law, notably pertaining to the rights to freedom of expression and association, the right to respect for private life, the right to a fair trial and the prohibition of discrimination,” he wrote in a letter to Speaker of the National Assembly László Kövér on 27 May. “I further recommend that they engage with national and international partners, including the Council of Europe, on how best to promote transparency in democratic processes while creating an enabling environment for civil society organisations and other entities who contribute to democratic debate by engaging on issues of public interest,” he added.
A new United Nations report has revealed that Ukrainian refugees have made a significant positive contribution to Poland’s economy. According to the report, which was published by the United Nations Refugee Agency (UNHCR) and Deloitte on 10 June, Ukrainian refugees had a net impact of 2.7% to Poland’s gross domestic product in 2024 and their employment rate increased to 69% from 61% in the previous year. The report’s authors noted: “Poland’s swift opening of its labour market enabled refugees to integrate economically and support themselves primarily through work. Refugees are now active as employees, entrepreneurs, and consumers, driving demand and increasing productivity”. Speaking at a press conference to mark the launch of the report, UNHCR spokesperson Rafał Kostrzyński said: “This report debunks several myths. It is not true that the impact of refugees on the Polish economy is negative”.
Related articles
  
|
|
EUROPEAN DEVELOPMENTS
MEDITERRANEAN
- The Court of Justice of the EU has ruled that helping minors under one’s care to enter the EU is not a crime.
- The Italian Senate has passed the government’s controversial security law.
- Italy has ended its contracts with the Israeli cyber company Paragon following the scandal over the alleged misuse of spyware technology.
- A Greek naval court has charged 17 members of the Hellenic Coast Guard in connection with the deadly Pylos shipwreck.
- Two ECRE member organisations have submitted a new annulment application against the redesignation of Türkiye as a safe third country for refugees.
- A group of Greek NGOs has called on the Ministry of Asylum and Migration to stop evicting people on the move from camps.
- A group of Maltese NGOs has launched the ‘Malta Migration Archive’ to document the impact of Malta’s migration policies.
The Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) has ruled that bringing minors under one’s care into the EU is not a crime, even if it involves crossing borders without authorisation. On 3 June, the CJEU decided that actions aimed at protecting minors and preserving family unity should not be considered “facilitation of unauthorised entry” as defined by EU anti-smuggling legislation. Instead, the court recognised that such actions are an exercise of family responsibility. The court’s decision relates to the Kinsa case which involves a Congolese woman referred to as “O.B.” who used false passports to bring her daughter and niece to seek asylum in Italy and was subsequently charged with facilitating illegal entry. Commenting on the ruling, O.B.’s lawyer, Francesca Cancellaro, said that it had shown that “every national and European law can be challenged under the lens of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights”. She also suggested that it could prompt a “reconsideration of the entire anti-smuggling legislation, leaving no space for the criminalisation of migration and solidarity”.
On 4 June, the Italian Senate approved a controversial new “security” law proposed by the government. The Security Decree introduces harsher penalties for protest-related offences, including property damage, disruptive sit-ins and unauthorised demonstrations, and grants increased powers to law enforcement bodies. As a result of the new law, passive forms of protest such as blocking roads or engaging in sit-ins may result in prison sentences of two years or more, depending on the location of the activity. Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has praised the law as a “decisive step” towards strengthening the protection of citizens, vulnerable groups and law enforcement personnel. However, the legislation has sparked widespread protests and strong criticism from opposition parties, human rights organisations and advocates who have warned that it risks criminalising dissent, restricting civil liberties and undermining the right to peaceful assembly.
Italy has ended its contracts with the Israeli cyber company Paragon following the scandal over the alleged misuse of its spyware technology. According to a report by the Parliamentary Committee for the Security of the Republic (COPASIR), Italy’s intelligence services initially suspended and then fully terminated their use of Paragon’s spyware. The move came after revelations that the spyware had been used to monitor critics of the government, including journalists and the founder of the search and rescue NGO Mediterraneanea Saving Humans, Luca Casarini.
A Greek naval court has charged 17 members of the Hellenic Coast Guard in connection with the deadly Pylos shipwreck which occurred in June 2023. The captain of the coastguard vessel which was present when the Adriana fishing boat sank off the coast of Pylos with the loss of up to 650 people faces charges of “causing a shipwreck,” “dangerous interference of maritime transport,” and “failure to provide assistance”. The other crew members have been charged with “complicity” in the captain’s alleged actions. All 17 will be questioned in the coming weeks by the naval court’s deputy prosecutor after which the court will either proceed to a full trial or dismiss the charges.
The issue of designating Türkiye as a “safe third country” for refugees has returned to the Greek Council of State. On 10 June, ECRE member organisations the Greek Refugee Council and Refugee Support Aegean, submitted an annulment application against the latest joint ministerial decision which again lists Türkiye as a safe third country for people from Syria, Afghanistan, Somalia, Pakistan and Bangladesh who try to claim asylum there. Referring to mounting evidence, court rulings and reports, the two organisations have argued that Türkiye should not be considered “safe” because it fails to provide effective protection or access to asylum procedures for refugees.
A group of Greek NGOs has called on the Ministry of Asylum and Migration to stop evicting people on the move from camps. In a statement issued on 4 June, the 33 NGOs, including several ECRE member organisations, have warned that these evictions would put already vulnerable groups at greater risk by increasing the likelihood of them experiencing homelessness, exploitation, sexual assault and violence. They have also highlighted that evictions could disrupt children’s education and interrupt people’s employment. In order to minimise the risks they identified, the NGOs have urged the government to establish a sustainable and dignified support and integration framework that guarantees suitable accommodation for people on the move, regardless of their legal status, both during and after their stay in temporary reception facilities.
A new “voluntary repatriation plan” for Syrians has been launched in Cyprus. The scheme, which was presented by Deputy Minister of Migration and International Protection Nicholas Ioannides on 29 May, is targeting families, including couples without children, who applied for asylum or received international protection before 31 December 2024 and will initially be implemented June-August 2025. In order to participate in the scheme, which involves financial incentives to return to Syria, people are required to withdraw their asylum applications or renounce their international protection status, thereby ending their legal stay as recognised refugees. The scheme has received sharp criticism from NGOs, including ECRE member organisation the Cyprus Refugee Council (CRC). A spokesperson for CRC said: “Promoting return at this point, specifically targeting women and children, without even carrying out assessments on the conditions they will be returning to violates the best interest of the children and will place many of them in precarious situations”. In addition, the Syrians in Cyprus community advocacy group has warned that offering special residence and employment permits to Syrians only if their family members return to Syria goes against the principle of family reunification by risking separating families.
A group of Maltese NGOs, including ECRE member organisation the aditus Foundation, have launched the Malta Migration Archive to document the impact of Malta’s migration policies. The archive compiles data, testimonies and case studies to show how Malta’s delayed responses to distress calls and inaction at sea have endangered thousands of lives. Analysis of the archive’s data has revealed a major shift since Malta and Libya signed a coordination deal in May 2020. In 2020, migrant boats in Malta’s search and rescue zone were roughly three times more likely to be rescued by Maltese authorities than intercepted by Libyan forces. However, by 2024, this trend had reversed, with boats approximately ten times more likely to be intercepted by the Libyan coastguard than rescued by the Armed Forces of Malta.
Related articles
|
|
NEWS FROM THE ECRE OFFICE
The updated AIDA Country Report on France provides a detailed overview on legislative and practice-related developments in asylum procedures, reception conditions, detention of asylum applicants and content of international protection in 2024. It is accompanied by an annex which provides an overview of temporary protection.
A number of key developments drawn from the overview of the main changes that have taken place since the publication of the update on 2023 are set out below.
Asylum procedure
- Statistics: 157,947 people registered asylum applications before the Single Desk for Asylum Applicants (GUDA) in 2024. The main countries of origin of asylum applicants were Ukraine, Afghanistan, Haïti, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guinea and Côte d’Ivoire. The Office for the Protection of Refugees and Stateless Persons (OFPRA) recorded 153,600 asylum applications in 2024. This represented a slight increase from the previous year. The overall protection rate at first instance in 2024 was 8%, also an increase from 2023.
- Access to the territory: In 2024 and early 2025, internal border controls covered all land, sea and air internal borders. In February 2024, the Council of State cancelled the article of law which allowed refusals of entry to be issued in all circumstances and without any distinction in the context of the re-establishment of internal border controls. A total of 45,203 people were detected as they tried to cross the Channel towards the UK irregularly in 2024 while 6,310 people were rescued at sea and at least 82 people died. In April 2024, the Ombudsperson published a decision revealing that serious and massive violations of the rights of people seeking asylum who had been stopped at the Italian border were ongoing.
- Registration of asylum applications: Although the three-day dealine for registering asylum applications was generally respected in 2024, the situation was extremely complicated in at least three territories: in Isère (mainland France), waiting times reached approximately two months at the end of 2024, in French Guiana, waiting times exceeded 18 months at times in 2024, and in Mayotte, the relevant office of the prefecture has been closed since October 2024 and no alternative solution has been provided.
- Reform of the National Court of Asylum (CNDA): Since September 2024, asylum applicants registered in certain areas have had their appeals examined by one of four new territorial chambers. Also following the 2024 legal reform, cases in all types of procedures are, in principle, ruled upon by a single judge rather than a three-judge panel.
- Dublin statistics and reduced deadline to appeal: In 2024, French authorities placed 25,875 people under the Dublin procedure. The transfer rate in 2024 was 8.2%. Since the 2024 reform, the time that people have had to appeal against a transfer decision has been reduced from 15 to seven days.
Reception conditions
- Orientation mechanism: Of the 108,284 people who were offered reception conditions outside the Ile-de-France (Paris region) between 2021 and 2024, 29,523 refused and 14,241 others who accepted did not go to the designated accommodation. This led to a deprivation of reception conditions for 43,764 people. The average rate of orientation refusals and no shows has increased since the mechanism was introduced in 2021, including in 2023-2024 period.
- Asylum applicants without any material reception conditions: A comparison of the number of asylum applications that were pending at the end of 2024 (147,950 according to the European Statistical Office (Eurostat)) and the number of asylum applicants who were benefitting from reception conditions at this time (90,329 according to the Office for Immigration and Integration (OFII), reveals that more than 50,000 people did not have any reception conditions.
- Lack of reception capacity: At the end of 2024, the Ministry of Interior stated that 64% of asylum applicants eligible for material reception conditions were being effectively accommodated (compared to 59% at the end of 2023). When the remaining 36% are added to those people who were not benefiting from any reception conditions at all, this suggests that there were insufficient places for almost 90,000 asylum applicants at the end of 2024. New places that were foreseen in the 2024 Budget Law were not opened due to budgetary constraints while the €69 million reduction in the funding available for housing asylum applicants that was foreseen in the 2025 Budget Law could lead to the closure of several thousand places.
- Ban on accommodating unaccompanied children in hotels: Following a legal reform in 2022, as of 2024, children can no longer be accommodated in hotels.
Detention of asylum applicants
- New and expanded grounds for detention: The 2024 legal reform has allowed for the detention of asylum applicants who present a threat to public order at any point in the procedure or who express a wish to apply for asylum in a location other than in the prefecture and who present a risk of absconding. This framework has become firmly established in practice in Mayotte where access to the prefecture has been impossible since October 2024. The 2024 reform also extended the grounds for detention of people who have placed under the Dublin procedure before the adoption of a transfer decision.
- Prohibition of detention of all minors: The detention of minors – regardless of their status – has been prohibited in mainland France since February 2024. This prohibition will enter into force in Mayotte in 2027. In previous years, the vast majority of accompanied children who were detained in France were detained in Mayotte.
Content of international protection
- Hindered access to rights due to delays in receiving documentation: The ability of beneficiaries of international protection to access their rights was severely hindered by the impossibility of receiving their birth certificates from OFPRA in a timely manner in 2024. The absence of birth certificates meant that they are unable to receive residence permits from prefectures and this in turn meant that they were unable to access services (e.g. housing, employment, bank accounts, social welfare, etc.). Although it decreased for the first time in several years, the average time for OFPRA to provide documents in 2024 was 10.5 months.
- Scope of global integration programme restricted: Due to budget restrictions, the scope of the Comprehensive and Individualised Support for the Integration of Refugees (AGIR) programme has been reduced. Limits on the number of people who can be supported under the programme have been set for each department and prioritisation criteria have been established for 2025.
Temporary protection
- Increased interest in international protection status by Ukrainians: According to the government, 56,314 active temporary protection residence permits were held by Ukrainian adults at the end of 2024 (up from 62,438 at the end of 2023). Meanwhile, the number of Ukrainian asylum applicants (11,800 first asylum applications) was four times higher than in 2023. A total of 6,923 Ukrainian nationals were granted international protection in 2024 (up from 2,350 in 2023).
- Discontinuation of French language training: In April 2024, French language training was discontinued due to budget cuts and is not expected to be restarted in 2025.
- Government guidelines issued to encourage transition of beneficiaries of temporary protection towards other statuses: In December 2024, the prime minister issued guidelines notably to “speed up access to residence permits for the most integrated beneficiaries of temporary protection” by asking prefectures to, whenever possible under the current law and conditions, redirect applications towards more permanent residence permits in order to “promote their professional and social integration”.
The full report is available here and the annex on temporary protection is available here.
For more information about the AIDA database or to read other AIDA reports, please visit the AIDA website.
|
|
NEWS FROM THE ECRE OFFICE
The updated AIDA Country Report on Ireland provides a detailed overview on legislative and practice-related developments in asylum procedures, reception conditions, detention of asylum applicants and content of international protection in 2024. It is accompanied by an annex which provides an overview of temporary protection.
A number of key developments drawn from the overview of the main changes that have taken place since the publication of the update on 2023 are set out below.
Asylum procedure
- Statistics: In 2024, Ireland received 18,560 applications for international protection. The International Protection Office issued a total of 13,099 decisions of which 3,888 were positive (30% overall protection rate). 28% of the applicants were children under 18 and there was a significant increase in the number of unaccompanied minors arriving in the country. The main countries of origin of asylum applicants were Nigeria, Jordan, Pakistan, Somalia and Bangladesh.
- Access to the territory: In 2024, Ireland implemented stronger border controls – resulting in increased arrests and charges for failure to produce valid travel documents – and intensified checks at the Northern Ireland border. Civil society organisations raised concerns about potential refusals of entry to the international protection process.
- Use of safe country concepts: Throughout 2024, Ireland expanded and applied the accelerated international protection procedure for applicants from designated “safe countries of origin”, prioritising those from Nigeria and Jordan. The list of safe countries was updated in 2024 to include Algeria, Botswana, Brazil, Egypt, India, Malawi and Morocco. Meanwhile, the UK’s designation as a “safe country” was challenged in a High Court ruling which found Ireland’s legislation to be insufficiently aligned with EU law, as it did not require an assessment of the potential risk of serious harm to people if they were returned to a safe third country. This led to legislative amendments in mid-2024 in order to address the gap in existing legislation and to enable the resumption of returns to the UK.
Reception conditions
- Reception conditions: In 2024, Ireland’s reception system for international protection applicants faced severe strain, with capacity shortages leading to prolonged street homelessness for single men. Reception conditions deteriorated further with increased reliance on overcrowded emergency centres and substandard tented facilities, prompting serious concerns about human dignity, basic needs and mental health. A landmark High Court ruling (currently under appeal) found the State to be in breach of its obligations under EU law for failing to provide an adequate standard of living. Monitoring of reception conditions was strengthened in 2024 as the Health Information and Quality Authority assumed responsibility for inspecting International Protection Accommodation Service centres under legally binding national standards. Inspection reports published in November 2024 revealed non-compliance in six out of the nine centres monitored in key areas, including safeguarding, accommodation standards, governance and responsiveness to residents’
Temporary protection
- Statistics: As of February 2025, 112,189 people had registered for temporary protection in Ireland since March 2022. A total of 25,208 beneficiaries were residing in state-provided accommodation and 36,532 were in hosted or pledged arrangements. At the same time, 23,803 people had accessed the labour market while 17,420 Ukrainian students were enrolled in schools (10,483 in primary and 6,937 in secondary). By March 2025, 56,082 people were in receipt of income support and 14,774 were receiving child benefit, while 87,639 medical cards had been issued.
- Accommodation support: The government has proposed a reduction in the Accommodation Recognition Payment from €800 to €600 per month (initially introduced at €400), but this had not taken effect as of April 2025. In addition, Helping Irish Hosts stepped back from the Pledge Programme Consortium in April 2025 and the Irish Red Cross assumed full responsibility for the management and matching of pledged accommodation.
- Change in travel requirements:, Ireland initially suspended the requirement for a biometric passport for people fleeing the conflict in Ukraine and accepted alternative documents to facilitate urgent travel. However, this temporary measure was lifted in June 2024 and Ukrainian nationals were once again required to present a valid biometric passport to enter the country, with the government citing the need for a shift from emergency to more sustainable response mechanisms.
The full report is available here and the annex on temporary protection is available here.
For more information about the AIDA database or to read other AIDA reports, please visit the AIDA website.
|
|
RECENT REPORTS
ECRE
June
May
ECRE Member Organisations
May
Others
June
May
- Bridge EU, 1.1 billion euros, 63 projects, six countries, one pattern: How EU funds violate fundamental rights
- Centre for European Policy Studies, For when the war ends: prospects and policy options for Ukrainian refugees
- Civil Society Europe, Joint Civil Society Contribution on Civic Space to the 2025 Annual Rule of Law Report
- Council of Europe, Annual Report on ECRI’s Activities
- Future Governance Forum, Asylum Management Centres: A new approach to tackle small boat crossings
- SOS Humanity, Borders of (In)humanity
- Stierl, M., Performing geographies of disappearance: migration and the case of the Saharan knowledge claim
- Tahir Institute for Middle East Policy, Externalization of EU Migration Control to the MENA Region
- United Nations Refugee Agency (UNHCR), Sea Arrivals Overview – Europe Region
- Union of Turkish Bar Associations, Report on Unlawful Deportation Proceedings
- We Are Monitoring, Report from the Poland-Belarus Border (April 2025)
- Women for Refugee Women, Safety and Survival: How the Work Ban Fuels Violence Against Women Seeking Asylum
|
|
UPCOMING EVENTS
ECRE Member Organisations
- 16 June, Madrid and Online, Presentación Informe Anual CEAR 2025, Spanish Commission for Refugee Aid (CEAR)
- 17 June, Artificial intelligence, artificial security: Digital technologies and authoritarian politics, Collaborative Research Center for Resilience and Statewatch
- 18 June, Dublin, Communications and Media Skills Workshop, Irish Refugee Council and Oxfam Ireland
- 20 June, Lyon, Marche des parapluies, Forum réfugiés
- 21 September, Ghent, Refugee Walk, Flemish Refugee Action
Others
- 17 June, Online, Dignity in the digital age: AI, surveillance and migration in Europe, Europe Must Act
- 17 June, London, Creating Spaces of Sanctuary, University College London
- 22 June, Brussels, Film Screening: Cuba & Alaska, Clin d’Oeil Films
- 28 June, Antwerp, Qommunity Festival, Queers on the Move
- 30 June – 1 July, Vienna, Inaugural Conference: Migration in times of Polarization, Vienna Centre for Migration and Law
- 2 July, Brussels, Invest in what matters: The EU long-term budget and new EP Campaign, European Parliament
- 6-8 October, Florence, Effective Migration Governance: Policy Impacts and Trade-Offs, European University Institute (Deadline for applications: 8 September)
- 20-21 November, Vienna, Fachkonferenz : Flüchten – Ankommen – Bleiben, Integrationshaus
|
|
OPEN JOB VACANCIES
ECRE Member Organisations
- Jesuit Refugee Service Malta, Communications and Fundraising Volunteer, 20 June
- Kids in Need of Defense, Case Manager – Europe, Prague
- Safe Passage, Immigration Lawyer/Immigration Caseworker Supervisor, London, 15 June
- Scottish Refugee Council, Refugee Integration Adviser, Glasgow, 23 June
- Scottish Refugee Council, Refugee Integration Adviser (Maternity cover), Glasgow, 21 July
Others
- Boat Refugee Foundation, Medical Volunteer, Lesvos
- Collective Aid, Lesvos Programmes Manager, Lesvos
- Europe Cares, Volunteers, Lesvos
- I Have Rights, Volunteer Caseworker, Samos, 23 June
- I Have Rights, Volunteer Interpreters (Kurmanji and Amharic/Tigrinya), Remote
- Islington Law Centre, Children’s Rights Immigration Litigation Solicitor, 16 June
- Maastricht University, PhD position: Sustaining Borders and Displacement Through Refugee Entrepreneurship, Maastricht, 31 August
- Migrants' Rights Network, Legal Expert – Criminal Law
- Mobile Info Team, Legal Project Manager, Thessaloniki
- MV Louise Michel, Chief Engineers
- Platform for International Cooperation on Undocumented Migrants, Advocacy Trainees, Brussels, 22 June
- Platform for International Cooperation on Undocumented Migrants, Events and Communications Trainee, Brussels, 25 June
- Samos Volunteers, General Volunteers, Language Teachers, Psychologists, Logistics Officer, Community Centre Officers, Communications Officer and Project Manager, Samos
- Sea-Watch, Search and Rescue Coordinator, Remote, 22 June
- Sea-Watch, Electrician
- Sea-Watch, IT Technical Lead, Berlin, 15 June
- Sea-Watch, Media Airborne Officer, 15 June
- Sea-Watch, Intern (Supervision and Psychological Support Department), Berlin
- SolidariTee, Volunteers
|
|
ONGOING CAMPAIGNS
ECRE Member Organisations
Others
|
|
CALLS FOR PAPERS, PROJECT PROPOSALS, UNIVERSITY COURSES etc.
Call for Applications
Call for Nominations
Calls for Papers
Calls for Scholarships
|
|
|
|
